Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On January 25, 2013, the Seoul High Court sentenced two years to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act at the Seoul High Court on May 9, 2014, which was the grace period, on October 24, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2014, and the suspended sentence became void, and the execution of the sentence was completed in the one-year prison for the North Korean defectors of the North Korean Peninsula on May 22, 2016.

1. On July 7, 2016, around 05:43, Defendant A: (a) discovered “E” PC on the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 2 floor; (b) discovered the victim F, who was diving; and (c) cited and stolen the victim’s cellular phone in an amount equivalent to one million won at the market price, which is the victim’s possession that the victim came above his/her book.

2. On July 9, 2016, Defendant B, upon receipt of a request from A to see a place where gallonian 5 mobile phones can be sold, Defendant B entered a writing that “it is 50,000 won or more of the gallon 5 mobile phones owned by A,” and written A’s Kakao A’s Kakaodididi in this article, with knowledge of the fact that gallon 5 mobile phoness are stolen goods, the market value of the gallon 5 mobile phones owned by the victim F., the victim F., the Defendant, even though having been aware of the fact that gallon 5 mobile phoness are stolen goods, shall sell gallon 5 mobile phoness by accessing Adina Internet

The Defendant, in front of the CJ Home Shopping Building in front of the CJ Home Shopping Building, in which A had reported and contacted the above writing, sold the above mobile phone to 2.10,000 won, and arranged the transfer of stolen goods, and received KRW 50,000 in return for the above arrangement from A in an influent place in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government basin on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each prosecutor's suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Each photograph;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Criminal records;

1. A copy of each judgment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal confinement;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;