logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.05.12 2016고단146
경범죄처벌법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2015, while under the influence of alcohol on December 19, 2014:31, the Defendant found it as the Jeju-si Police Station D District located in Jeju-si and received questioning from E, etc. of the circumstances and circumstances belonging to the said district group about the purpose of visit.

Mara, Mabk Mabk Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz. Habk for returning home to the above E, as it stands.

To arrest, Ra, whether tax is received in such formula.

Along with the influence of 50 minutes, such as passing through sound, a riotous and scamous speech and behavior in the D District, which is a public office, was conveyed by very rough words and behavior.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on the Punishment of Minor Offenses, and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Selection of fines for the crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments shall be determined as ordered by the Criminal Procedure Act.

favorable circumstances: The defendant recognized the crime of this case and divided his mistake;

A. Unfavorable circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced to two years of probation on September 4, 2014 by the Jeju District Court on the grounds of interference with the performance of official duties, etc.; (b) on September 12, 2014, the said judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2014; and (c) in addition, the Defendant was issued a summary order on two occasions in 2015 as a crime of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act similar to the instant crime.

arrow