logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.06.10 2015고단1511
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 2, 2015, at around 19:55, the Defendant sent to the site the bus engineer D with a noise, etc. on the bus No. 25-1, which was stopped on the front of the city of 19:5, the passenger of the Susung-si, Gyeonggi-do, and the bus No. 25-1, which was stopped on the street B, and called the Defendant.

The Defendant expressed to the above police officers that “this Chewing sprinker ........, she saw the above police officers to get out of the bus and returned home.” However, the Defendant, without disregarding this, she set up a spacker to the spacker’s sprink, she added the spacker to the spacker’s spacker’s spacker, and she took the spacker’s sprink, and she removed the Defendant from the sprink, and then the police officers were removed from the spacker’s vehicle to safe delivery, with the Gap’s own hand spacker’s left face part at one time, she assaulted the bucker’s sprink on a hand, and she continued to walk the spacker’s sprink on the side, and cut off the spack on the road.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. A photograph of the damaged part;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing Hand-on video CDs to police officers in mobilization;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) was reported by 112 and assaulting a police officer who was dispatched to the police and obstructing the performance of his/her official duties, and the crime was bad, and the police officer was committed by citing a stone, which is a dangerous object in the course of assaulting a police officer.

arrow