1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2.However, the execution of the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 03:57 on June 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) asked the victim F, who is a police officer of the Sungnam Police Station E (a police station affiliated with the Sungnam Police Station, called “12 Report .............. on the 112 Report ......................) called “hing to be sprinked........ to be sprinked to be sprinked”; and (b) provided that the victim G, a police officer affiliated with the same police box, expressed his desire to “hing to be sping to a police officer” to the said victim’s “Isping to be sping......”

Accordingly, the defendant insultd the victims openly.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in Paragraph 1, brought a bath to F and G, followed the police officers to depart from the patrol vehicle, and followed the police officers’ voice, “I see whether you will with a view to leaving the patrol vehicle,” and prevented the police officers from departing from the patrol vehicle, thereby making a police officer G again notify the Defendant that I would return to the Defendant when I would go home from the patrol vehicle, “I d Han d'I d' I d', and use G’s neck with a arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

2. The police statement concerning G and F;

3. Application of H’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

4. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;