logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 03. 10. 선고 2015두58515 판결
(심리불속행) 양도소득세 체납에 따른 압류처분으로 무효에 해당하지 않음[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu37732 ( November 10, 2015)

Title

(ps) It does not constitute invalidation due to a seizure disposition in arrears of capital gains tax.

Summary

(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the preceding disposition of this case and the seizure disposition of this case are null and void is not acceptable, on the other hand, there are no special circumstances that the notice of tax payment or the notice of attachment disposition would not be served.

Related statutes

Article 45 of the National Tax Collection Act: Attachment Procedure for Real Estate

Cases

2015du58515 Nullification of attachment disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

KimA

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Seodaemun Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu37732 Decided November 10, 2015

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

arrow