Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Seoul High Court 2015Nu37732 ( November 10, 2015)
Title
(ps) It does not constitute invalidation due to a seizure disposition in arrears of capital gains tax.
Summary
(2) The Plaintiff’s assertion that the preceding disposition of this case and the seizure disposition of this case are null and void is not acceptable, on the other hand, there are no special circumstances that the notice of tax payment or the notice of attachment disposition would not be served.
Related statutes
Article 45 of the National Tax Collection Act: Attachment Procedure for Real Estate
Cases
2015du58515 Nullification of attachment disposition
Plaintiff-Appellant
KimA
Defendant-Appellee
Head of Seodaemun Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2015Nu37732 Decided November 10, 2015
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the judgment below and the appellate brief examined the records of this case, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4 (1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal, or are recognized to be groundless. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of