Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of forging official documents at the Seoul Central District Court on November 2, 2007, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 2, 2007. On January 18, 2008, the judgment was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. at the same court on April 14, 2008 and became final and conclusive on April 14, 2008. On February 10, 2009, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 3,

Although a person who intends to engage in credit business or loan brokerage business has registered the relevant place of business with the competent authority, the Defendant, without registering the credit business or loan brokerage business with the competent authority, operated credit business and loan brokerage business with the name of Gangnam-gu Seoul E from the beginning of 2007 to June 2007 without registering the credit business or loan brokerage business with the competent authority.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning F, G, and H;

1. A copy of E-mail of a stock company (representative director A);

1. Investigation report (verification related to companies leasing businesses operating suspects);

1. Investigation report (to hear statements related to credit business);

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records and investigation reports;

1. Article 19 (1) 1 and Article 3 (1) of the former Act on the Registration of Credit Business, etc. and Protection of Finance Users (Amended by Presidential Decree No. 9344, Jan. 21, 2009) concerning facts constituting an offense (the fact that a credit business or credit brokerage business is run, and the selection of fines);

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. On May 19, 2010, the Defendant was present as a witness of a suit of objection between the Defendant J of 2009Gahap759, Plaintiff J of 2009, Plaintiff J of 2009 and swornly proved as follows.

The testimony of F as to whether the former owner was aware of J is the latter is the latter, the latter F and I are the latter.