logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2014.08.22 2014고단324
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On July 24, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc., in the Western District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court, and one year of imprisonment with prison labor for night room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room room,

[2014 Highest 324] On March 13, 2014, the Defendant stolen KRW 80,000 in cash at the E-store operated by the victim D in Ansan-si, Dong-si, as an employee, while working as an employee at the E-store operated by the victim D.

[2014 Highest 410]

1. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment Act;

A. The Defendant appears to have clearly written indictment on April 18, 2014, which appears to be a clerical error.

At 02:00, the gap in F Gel 103 located in Daegu Northern-gu, the victim H was stolen by taking advantage of the key of Samsung Ggal lusular phone, one cash 20,000 won, Daegu bank cream card, etc. owned by the victim, and the key of the victim I’s J Ebuas car owned by the victim.

B. The Defendant: (a) driven a victim I who was set up in front of the same temporary border or the Daegu Northern-gu K, with the time zone for the JJE car owned by the Defendant; and (b) stolen it.

2. Violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and fraud prosecutor have applied the stolen credit card to the fraud of “property profit” in relation to the use of the stolen credit card for the purchase of goods, but it is reasonable to view it as the fraud of “property”. Therefore, part of the facts charged was modified to the extent that it is recognized as identical to the facts charged

On April 18, 2014, at around 03:16, the Defendant purchased 2 cigarettes from the Victim L, operated by the Victim L, in Daegu Northern-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, (Clost) and, as seen above, presented the Daegu-gu Bank Cream Card under the name of H, and made the price as if the Defendant used his credit card.

arrow