Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Around July 26, 2013, the Defendant asserted that C, living together with the Hongsung-gun Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, had brought about all his property, and that C had filed a property division claim (2013 Ma269; hereinafter “instant family lawsuit”) against C. In the instant family lawsuit, the Defendant’s words to the effect that “the Defendant did not have any money to be received from C, and rather has to have any damage repaid to C,” who is his father, submitted to C the recorded file in the form of a telephone recording to the court, and had the intent to file a false criminal complaint as follows.

Around December 2, 2013, the Defendant prepared a false statement about C and D in the form of a complaint in the public service center of the Daejeon District public prosecutor's office located in the Hongsung-gun Hong-gun, Hongsung-gun, Hongsung-gun, and made a supplementary statement about C and D around January 8, 201 at the investigation and the economic team office of the head of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the head of the Dong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the head of the Si/Gun/Gu.

The contents of the written complaint and the statement on supplement of complaint were as follows: “The male voice recorded by C and D in the family litigation of this case with a false file in which C and D were not aware of each other, shall be submitted to the court for the purpose of bringing them into favorable interest in the family litigation of this case, and thus, they shall be investigated as a crime of attempted fraud and punished.”

However, on February 15, 2012, the Defendant made a statement to the effect that “A person does not have to pay one million won only because he did not pay one million won,” and rather, C shall have to pay the amount of damage by having committed the crime.” On December 2, 2013, the Defendant was well aware of the Defendant’s voice as well as the Defendant’s voice, since he heard with E and E, a family affairs investigator, the recording file of the said speech at the family coordination office of the above court No. 216, which was around December 2, 2013.

Nevertheless, on December 2, 2013, the defendant is a public official in charge of the foregoing red branch office.