Text
1. The Defendant: (a) 1,000,000 won to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and 5% per annum from January 5, 2015 to June 25, 2015.
Reasons
1. The gist of the plaintiff and the designated parties asserted are the Dong representative of Suwon-si I apartment complex in Suwon-si, and from around July 1, 201, the autonomous council and senior citizens' council composed of Dong representative and standing auditors were operated. However, from around several times in several times, the defendant is obligated to pay consolation money in two million won to the plaintiff and the designated parties, by filing a complaint, accusation, and civil petition with the relevant agency several times, asserting that "the plaintiff and the designated parties illegally operated the autonomous council and embezzled public funds in collusion with the president of the veterans' office." The defendant filed a complaint, accusation, and civil petition with the relevant agency. The above facts were damaged by openly disclosing them to the residents of the apartment of this case. Furthermore, the plaintiff damaged the reputation by openly pointing out the disturbance of the office of the senior citizens' office where the plaintiff is the head, thereby interfering with the plaintiff's business and suffering from mental suffering.
2. Determination on the claim for damages caused by the obstruction of business against the plaintiff
A. Facts 1) The Plaintiff and the designated parties are as follows: (a) Suwon-gu I apartment complex (hereinafter “instant apartment”) that was prepared by the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs to persons who rendered distinguished services to the State; and (b)
(2) Around 11:00 on August 12, 201, the Defendant operated an autonomous council and senior citizens’ association composed of the same representative and standing auditors from around July 1, 201. (2) around August 12, 201, the Defendant interfered with the Plaintiff’s business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as filing a complaint with the Plaintiff who arranged documents, such as preparing a statement of the current status of revenue and expenditure of the autonomous council and senior citizens’ association at the autonomous council and the office of the senior citizens’ association of the instant apartment and the office of the senior citizens’ association, and filing a written resolution of the autonomous council’s expenditure.
(3) On March 14, 2012, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 500,000,000 as to the instant act of interference with business (which was ordered by the Suwon District Court 2012 high-level 878), and the Defendant requested formal trial and filed a request therefor with the Suwon District Court.