1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who has concluded an automobile insurance contract with C Vehicle (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is the insurer who has concluded the automobile insurance contract with D Vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

나. 원고차량은 2013. 1. 3. 16:32경 창원시 마산합포구에 있는 자동차전용도로인 남해안대로 현동나들목 부근 편도 4차로 중 1차로를 동전터널 방면에서 밤밭고개 방면으로 진행하던 중 전방에서 같은 방향으로 진행하던 E 차량(이하 ‘소외차량’이라 한다)이 갑자기 속도를 줄이는 것을 보고 급제동하였으나 멈추지 못하고 원고차량 앞부분으로 소외차량의 뒷부분을 충격하였고(이하 ‘1차 사고’라 한다), 계속하여 원고차량을 뒤따라오던 피고차량도 원고차량과의 충돌을 피하기 위해 급제동하였으나 멈추지 못하고 피고차량 앞부분으로 원고차량 뒷부분을 충격하였다(이하 ‘2차 사고’라 한다). 다.

In the instant accident, F was injured by the Defendant, and the Defendant paid F the insurance money of KRW 72,383,250 in total to F as the name of hospital treatment costs and damages, and then filed a request for deliberation with G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “G”) which is the insurer of the non-party vehicle and the Plaintiff, respectively, at the Deliberation Committee on the Settlement of Automobile Insurance Claim (hereinafter “Deliberation Committee”).

On September 11, 2017, with respect to the case for which the Defendant filed a request for deliberation against G, the Deliberation Committee, taking into account some degree of negligence caused by Non-Party 1, 60%:10% of the fault ratio of the Defendant and Non-Party 1 (7,238,325 won, 72,383,250 won x 10%). On November 13, 2017, in consideration of the circumstances of the accident regarding the case for which the Defendant filed a request for deliberation against the Plaintiff, the negligence ratio of the Plaintiff and the Defendant 1 to 30%:60%.