logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.04.26 2015가단34263
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant B shall have the entire one floor of the real estate listed in the Schedule No. 1:

B. The defendant C shall be listed in the annexed Table 3.

Reasons

1. Indication of claims: It is as shown in the Attached Form “Cause of Claim”.

2. The omission of reasons for judgment against the remaining Defendants except Defendant F: Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act (i.e., by service by public notice).

3. As to Defendant F: In full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including each number), the Plaintiff Union may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff Union was using the entire real estate indicated in the attached Table No. 11 in the instant project area, as an redevelopment and maintenance project partnership that obtained authorization on December 18, 2007 to implement the redevelopment and improvement project (hereinafter “instant project”) in the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M (hereinafter “instant project”).

According to Article 49 (6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Residents' Environments and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the right to use and benefit from each leased real estate of Defendant F shall be deemed to have been transferred to the Plaintiff Union along with the authorization and public notice of the project management and disposal plan of this case. Therefore, Defendant F is obligated to deliver all

The plaintiff's claim against the defendant F is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow