logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.04.20 2016가단26009
건물명도
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: The real estate listed in the Schedule No. 1;

B. The defendant C shall be the real estate listed in the attached Form 3 list.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association that has obtained authorization for the establishment of a partnership under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”).

B. The head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government approved the management and disposal plan on February 25, 2016 on the housing redevelopment improvement project implemented by the Plaintiff, and announced it around that time.

C. Defendant B owns the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, Defendant D owns the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 3, and Defendant L(P No. 11) owns the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 6.

On the other hand, Defendant C is one of the real estate listed in the attached Table 3 list; Defendant E is 35.12 square meters inboard (A) which connects each point in the attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 11, and 1 among the real estate strata listed in the attached Table 4 list; Defendant F is 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 5, 6, 7, and 8; Defendant G (B) is 40.12 square meters in sequence among the real estate strata listed in the attached Table 4 list; Defendant G is 40.5 square meters in whole among the real estate strata listed in the attached Table 4 list; Defendant G is 60.4 square meters in proportion to each of the above real estate stories listed in the attached Form 4 list; and Defendant G is 45 square meters in proportion to each of the above real estate stories listed in the attached Table 4 list; and Defendant G is 65 square meters in whole among the attached Table 45.

Defendant B, D, and L (C No. 11) are both objects of cash settlement. The Plaintiff consulted with the owners of real estate in the project implementation district, including the said Defendants on the acquisition of such real estate, but did not reach an agreement due to reasons such as the lack of compensation, etc., the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication with the local Land Tribunal in Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

arrow