The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below which found the defendant guilty on the ground that the defendant did not have any flabbbbage of the victim at the time of the instant case, since he did not have any flabbbbbage, he was injured by the victim by flabing blab,

2. The victim made a statement from the police to the court of the court below to the effect that “I am febbling one another while I am while I saw the Defendant’s bath, and ambling one another while the two-lane Defendant am febbbbbling one another, and am febbbbling one another, and am febbling one another, at the time she was febbbbing one’s left by her own mistake.” The victim made a statement in a very concrete and detailed manner as well as the damage inflicted on her own as well as the damage inflicted on her own, which is disadvantageous to her. Therefore, the victim’s statement is reasonable in its explanation, and is consistent, it does not appear that

In addition, although the witness G and H are partly different from the detailed circumstantial explanation, the fact that the defendant and the victim made a statement in the same manner that "the defendant and the victim were breathing," (the 53 pages, 56 pages of the trial record), and the victim suffered bodily injury, such as the culp bal, which requires treatment for about 14 days, two days after the date of the occurrence of the instant case.

“Along with the time and time of the instant injury, the date of preparation is relatively close to the time of the instant injury, there are no circumstances to doubt the credibility of the details of the issuance of the written injury, and the part and degree of the injury are consistent with the cause and details of the injury alleged by the victim. ③ The instant case was caused by the Defendant’s act of driving away the victim, etc., which led to the Defendant and the victim.