Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. On May 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 12:45 on May 17, 2014, 2014, the Defendant, against the victim’s assaulted on the road in front of the Suwon-gu Suwon-gu Catho road; (b) and (c) dumpeded the epib of D, thereby causing injury to D, such as salt, tension, etc. for about two weeks.
2. The Defendant denies the facts charged.
A victim's statement is made with direct evidence consistent with the facts charged and there is an injury diagnosis report with indirect evidence.
The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court: (i) the victim reported the fact that the victim was in need of telephone call after the fighting was terminated; and (ii) the neutral witness E expressed that the victim’s name appears to conflict with the victim’s own statement that he was unilaterally abused (the defendant reported to the police) and that the victim was "the victim was dead (the defendant)" ; (iii) the victim was issued only after the diagnosis and did not receive treatment; and (iv) the victim stated that "the victim was dead upon the victim’s flabing and booming the victim’s body and flabing the victim’s body, and the victim was 1-2 meters after the flabing of the victim’s body, and the victim was 1-6 meters after the body of the victim was flabed."
In addition, after having the defendant and the witness face each other in the process of the examination of the arm length, the part part of the body outside the arms of each other is added, and the defendant's arms are not in contact with the body of the witness (for the sale of the victim), there is a space to enter the body of the witness to the extent of drinking.
In light of the above, it is difficult to obtain a hot line, and ⑤ The defendant and the victim are victims who are one-time victims due to the violence of both parties at the time of the car problem.