1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

The plaintiff's primary claim part among the lawsuits of this case.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "No. 3, 2013.11.3" of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be "No. 13, 2013.13." "No. 5, No. 17" shall be read as "No. 1.3," and "the closure" of No. 6 shall be read as "the former Company Reorganization Act before it is abolished; No. 21" of No. 7, No. 21 as "the determination of preliminary claim" of "No. 1, No. 21, No. 21 as "No. 4, 18, 19" of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "No. 16, 19, 23, 24, 18, and 19 shall be deemed as "No. 2,000 after the expiration of the sale contract," and it shall be deemed as "No. 1,219," of "No. 12, as at the end of the sale period of an apartment.1,".2.2.

In addition, even if reorganization proceedings are commenced under the former Company Reorganization Act for the title holder of the real estate in possession during the period of acquisition by prescription, the possessor is appointed.