Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 3, 2012, the defendant prepared a written complaint against E using a computer at the D Hospital Office in the Gunsan-si C, a military court.

Around August 26, 2012, the Defendant stated in the above complaint that “Defendant E, the complainant, was punished by satisfing the part of the complainant’s right part to the right side and assaulting over the floor because the sound of the complainant’s vehicle was satisfyd on the G coffee shop in front of the G coffee shop in the Gunsan-si F.”

However, while the defendant was in an over-the-counter dispute at the time, he did not have been subject to violence, such as he voluntarily gets out of E due to the diversity of the diversity of E.

Nevertheless, around 15:00 on October 4, 2012, the Defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer, whose name cannot be known at the public service center of the military police station located in the Masan-dong 634-8, Masan-dong, Masan-dong.

In this respect, the defendant committed a false accusation for the purpose of having E receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement concerning H and I;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Statement made to A by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 157 and 153 of the Criminal Act for mitigation of confessions;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that a person subject to criminal punishment of the defendant's crime of this case is in danger of being subject to criminal punishment, and that the defendant was damaged by his daily life by being subject to criminal investigation for a considerable period of time. However, the defendant made a confession of the crime against the defendant, and the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant by mutual consent with the person under no charge and the person under charge, the defendant does not have any criminal records of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor, and the investigation of the criminal defendant's intention is without merit