logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 남원지원 2017.12.19 2017고단196
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "criminal history" was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of road traffic laws in support of the Southern District Court of the Jeonju on February 16, 2016 and the same year.

8. 16. The execution of the sentence was completed in the military prison.

On August 15, 2017, 2017, the Defendant 196, on August 21, 2017, driven the Banco-ray from the section of about 4 km to the road in front of 944 in order from the vicinity of the Dong high-priced road located in the Suwon-si Line transfer-dong, Suwon-si, without obtaining a driver's license for a motor vehicle, to the end of 944 km.

On October 18, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Highest 239, the Defendant, at around 2 km from a place where it is difficult to identify the location below the e-mail of the e-mail, without a driver’s license for a motor vehicle on October 18, 2017 to the 12nd road of the Si-Eup/Myeon in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 196"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the circumstances of driving without a license, and the ledger of driver's licenses "2017 Highest 239";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. "Criminal Records" in the arrest report of the occurrence of a case and the ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Application of replys to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports, and details of confinement of suspects to statutes;

1. Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the period of repeated crime, with reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act that aggravated concurrent crimes.

In addition, the 2017 Highest 196 case was judged to be pending in this court while committing the crime of "2017 Highest 239" case was committed.

It is inevitable to sentence a sentence because the defendant is too poor to the extent of light of the law and order.

The sentencing conditions stated in the records, such as the above circumstances and the defendant's age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime shall be determined in the same manner as the order.

arrow