A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 20, 2020, at around 11:55, the Defendant, at a convenience store located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, carried out trial expenses to female employees, received a report of 112 of the above employees, and called out to the police officer D, etc. who belongs to the Seoul Gangseo-gu Police Station C police box.

At around 12:20 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) 12:20 on the front of the convenience store, she saw D, who was asked for the instant situation, to display a drinking, flaps, and flaps, and continued to be arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of obstruction of performance of official duties, and was arrested as a flagrant offender on the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and boomed D’s name on the back seat.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the receipt and processing of reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs, such as tear tear, etc., or to capsize Rabs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act is considerably good, the punishment was determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.