The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal (two years and six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable; and

2. Although the Defendant appears to be against the recognition of the instant crime, the instant crime is committed against many and unspecified persons by taking the total of KRW 74,569,200 against about 2 years and 6 months, and the Defendant committed the instant crime despite the fact that he/she committed the instant crime even though he/she had been twice the same sentence, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the part of "Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act" in Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the use of private document assistance), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the use of private document assistance), and Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure (the use of private document assistance assistance) shall be corrected ex officio to change the term "the choice of imprisonment" to "the