The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (4 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant appears to be against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime, and the G in which the name was ambiguous does not want punishment when cancelling the Defendant’s complaint against the Defendant. However, the instant crime is committed by forging documents under the name of another person in the course of operating a mobile phone agency and opening the cell phone, and the Defendant has a criminal record of suspended execution, and in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable, in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, ex officio the application of the law of the judgment of the court below on 1. The pertinent provision of the law and the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the use of private document) and Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and Article 231 of the Criminal Act, and Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the use of private document).

1.The provisions of Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Code, and

1. Change of punishment to that of a sentence, or of a fine, for correction;

.