A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall commit any act of lending a means of access with promise to use and manage the means of access.

Nevertheless, at around 11:00 on January 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sent three physical cards connected to the account in the name of the Defendant to Kwikset-si (D), E Bank account (F), and G Bank account (H) through Kwikset-si, and continuously delivered on January 21, 2018, one physical cards connected to the account in the name of the Defendant’s name to Kwikset-si (K) account in the same manner as the name of the Defendant’s bank account (K) from the name in the name in the name in the name in the Burel C located near the Heak-gu terminal in Seo-gu, Young-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-si, 2018.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to provide compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. Application of reply materials (transaction details, etc.) and detailed statement of deposit transactions to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 49(4)2 and Article 6(3)21 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning criminal facts; Articles 40 and 50 of the same Act concerning the ordinary concurrent crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent offenders, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, Article 38(2), and Article 50 of the Criminal Act extended the e-mail card to the Defendant with promise of consideration. The act of lending the means of access for electronic financial transactions is not likely to be a crime because it damages the security and reliability of electronic financial transactions and can be used as a means of other crimes.

Not only a number of criminal records including the same kind of fine and a single penalty, but also a number of criminal records including a single sentence, the defendant cannot be seen to have shown that his appearance is unknown due to the seafarer life, etc. even after being served with the indictment in this case.

In addition, the defendant.