logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2019.08.14 2019가단902
손해배상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 32,00,000 as well as 15% per annum from March 15, 2019 to May 31, 2019 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is a licensed real estate agent, and even if he/she did not allow another person to render brokerage services using his/her name or trade name or lend his/her brokerage office registration certificate to another person, upon receipt of a payment of KRW 1 million per month from C for one year from January 2017, upon his/her request, and upon his/her request, he/she registered his/her business office as “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” with the trade name of “E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” in the Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, 2017, and thereafter lent C to conduct brokerage services using the qualification certificate and brokerage office registration certificate under the name of the Defendant in return for receiving KRW 1 million per month from C until May 2018.

B. In addition, the Defendant entrusted C with the E Licensed Real Estate Agent Office in the name of the Defendant, on February 7, 2017, and entered into a mutual aid agreement with the F Association under the name of the Defendant on February 6, 2017 between February 27, 2017 and February 6, 2018, and provided C with the said mutual aid agreement in the amount of KRW 100 million, and C provided brokerage services by presenting the said mutual aid certificate.

C. As above, C would be able to run a business using the above E Licensed Real Estate Agent's Office with illegally leased a licensed real estate agent's qualification certificate in the Defendant's name. On October 25, 2017, C would act as a broker of a lease agreement with respect to the building in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu and Seo-gu (Seoul) and H (hereinafter "the building in this case") around October 25, 2017. In fact, the owner of the building in this case did not obtain the right of representation regarding the lease agreement without being granted a monthly rent from I and forged the power of representation. In addition, I would have concluded a lease agreement with the Plaintiff on behalf of the Plaintiff, and even if the Plaintiff received KRW 32 million from the Plaintiff as a lease deposit, even if he did not intend to transfer it to I, the lease agreement with the Plaintiff by deceiving the Plaintiff: I's name and seal, C's name and seal, C's name and seal, and the lessee: the Plaintiff.

arrow