logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.05.31 2013고단694
장물취득
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant acquired a permanent residence in the Republic of Korea with Chinese nationality, and purchased a heavy mobile phone from February 2012, taking into account the underground shopping mall of Sungnam, Suwon, Gangnam, and Yeongdeungpo-gu.

1. On April 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) purchased 150,000 won from the one-story square of the first floor of the Anyang-gu Mayang-gu Mayang-si, the victim, who was lost, lost Mayang-si C’s Mayang-si, in his Mayang-si Mayang-si; and (b) acquired stolen goods by purchasing 150,000 won from the victim’s Mayang-si Ma

2. On April 10, 2012, around 17:00, the Defendant purchased the 90,000 stolen goods by purchasing the gallon gallon cell phone at KRW 860,00,00 even though he/she knew that it is stolen, the Defendant acquired the gallon gallon gallon mobile phone at KRW 860,00,00 in the market price owned by the victim E, who was stolen by his/her friendship D from his/her own, in front of the gallonian street.

3. At around 17:00 on May 17, 2012, the Defendant purchased the stolen goods from B on the first floor of the large-scale forest belt located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Guro-gu, and acquired the stolen goods by purchasing KRW 250,000, while being aware of the fact that one cost of the cellphone 4 mobile phone in the market value, which is the victim’s right of friendship F, owned by the victim.

4. At around 17:00 on May 27, 2012, the Defendant purchased a cellphone 4 mobile phone with a whitephone 250,000 won, even though he/she knew that it is a stolen property, from the first floor of the large forest basin located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant acquired the stolen at KRW 250,00.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning B;

1. Application of a written statement of transactions (four persons, including C, etc.) to statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 362 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

arrow