A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on a sound driving) with a fine of KRW 1 million, and KRW 2 million with a fine of KRW 2 million for the same crime from the branch court of Suwon District Court on June 25, 2008. However, on July 20, 2014, at around 10:50, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle of KRW 200,000 with a blood alcohol concentration of KRW 0.270,00 while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 8km under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.270,00 from the west-gu, west-do, as from the west-si, Pulri-si to the 5878-do west-do, when he was under the influence of alcohol.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the situation of driving under drinking;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, inquiry records, and application of each statute of the judgment;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation is that the defendant reflects the crime and has no ability to impose any penalty exceeding the fine, but there is no room for prior action in that the criminal records for the same crime do not seem to have shown the circumstances such as six times, etc.

Therefore, considering the age, character and conduct, circumstances after crimes, etc. of defendants, the punishment as ordered shall be determined as per Disposition.