logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2016.04.05 2015가단13565
제3자이의
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the instant movable property is not owned by the Cridge but owned by the Plaintiff’s individual, and it should not be subject to compulsory execution by the Defendant’s executive title against Cridges.

However, in light of the following facts: (a) evidence Nos. 3 through 7, etc. submitted by the Plaintiff submitted by the Plaintiff, each letter of donation Nos. 3 and 7, etc., was prepared after the execution of the seizure of the movable property of this case by the Plaintiff, and even according to the statement of the Cridge’s minutes (Evidence No. 2) submitted by the Plaintiff, “19 funerals” is deemed to belong to the C church; and (b) the Plaintiff, while the trial was in progress on Jan. 22, 2015, when the C church and the Defendant were in the name of the Plaintiff, a vehicle owned by the CSchool Association (Evidence No. 4), is difficult to believe all of them, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the facts alleged by the Plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow