A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was married with B on August 11, 2007 and divorced in around 2011. Around 2012, the Defendant was divorced again with B on July 2020, but was divorced again on or around July 2020. After July 2020, the Defendant was living together in Jeju-si Apartment and D, and maintained de facto marital relations, and the Defendant and B had A E (F students) and G (H students.

1. Violation of the Child Welfare Act (child abuse);

A. On June 15, 2017, around 04:40 on June 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) believed that B had been given written letters with another male in the above residence; (b) committed emotional abuse detrimental to the mental health of the victimized children by assaulting B, such as exceeding B, going through several times, drinking, etc., while viewing that E (9) and G (7) were the victimized children.

B. On October 26, 2019, around 01:30 on October 26, 2019, the Defendant considered B as “a child victim E (11 years of age) and G (9 years of age) on the ground that B was not in line with his/her own flag at the above residence,” and committed emotional abuse that may injure the mental health of the victimized child by assaulting B, such as hinging B with both hand, etc.

C. On May 1, 2020, at around 19:51, the Defendant suspected of having B’s external map in the above residence, and deemed B and Si expenses as the inspection date of B’s mobile phone, and deemed B as E (12 years of age) and G (10 years of age) the victimized party, the Defendant committed emotional abuse that may harm the mental health of the victimized party by verbal abuse, such as “Is other male and female, Is that Is. h. for the same year.”

On September 16, 2020, at around 23:08, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in a ward under the influence of alcohol in a state that it is doubtful of B’s external map as of September 16, 202, and is not suitable for appraisal as of the date of verbal abuse, and the victimized party E (12 years of age), G (10 years of age), Mono I, and B were in a room in the above residence, while the victimized party E (12 years of age), Mono I, and B was in a room in the above residence, B, and

(i) The eye of a eye;

(p) Now.