A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 26, 2015, around 02:30 on June 26, 2015, the Defendant recommended a police officer E belonging to the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station Diplomatic Police Station, who called out after receiving a report that he fats fats were fated without going through his business operation, to take part in several times, but she saw fats, and she fats the body fats with the face of the police officer F, who controlled fats the fats, with his fats and hand fats, and she fats the face of the police officer F, who was fated.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the maintenance of order of E and F, which is a police official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of statutes governing photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor or Hungary;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] No person who has no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (decision of sentence] (decision of sentence] in light of the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, degree of damage, and the fact that the defendant was punished for the obstruction of performance of official duties around 2013, etc., the criminal liability is heavy; however, the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime; the defendant did not have any record of punishment exceeding the fine; the defendant did not have any record of punishment; the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment is determined as per Disposition within the scope of Recommendation sentence, taking into account