A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those who are engaged in driving options car B;

On July 2, 2018, at around 20:25, the Defendant proceeded with the path 157, which is located in the 157-ro 3rd of the insular Cropic Cropic Cropic Cropic of the Cropic Cropic Cropic Zone.

At the time, the victim C(37 years of age) was stopping in accordance with the new subparagraph. In such a case, there was a duty of care to safely drive the car in order not to conflict with the above passenger car by making a person engaged in driving the car well-being.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and went away from the scene by taking the back of the Damas van as the front driver of the Defendant’s vehicle.

The Defendant continued to drive the observer car and continued to drive the observer car in front of the E-road at the time of harmony with 4 km away from the above site.

Since there is a center line of yellow-ray, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the entire city and to safely operate the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the back-hand part of the left-hand part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the upper left-hand part of the GM6 car driven by the Victim F (MM, 33 years old), which is driven by the injured Party F (F) due to the negligence of driving the central line.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim C, such as salt ties, tensions, etc., in light of the trend that requires treatment for about 18 days, injury to the victim F, such as base salt, tensions, etc., which requires treatment for about 18 days, and injury to the victim H (the victim F and the victim H (the 4 years old) who f and frighted, for about 2 weeks. In addition, the Defendant suffered injury to the fright base in light of the fright base, which requires treatment for about 3,77,50 won, such as replacement of back frighters.