Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On December 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had the petitioner D (year 38) from Cheongju-si, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) had the petitioner’s mobile phone number (E) opened by SK Telecom; and (c) had the petitioner’s driver’s license.

1. The Defendant who forged a private document intends to open a mobile phone in the name of the petitioner in addition to a mobile phone in the name of the petitioner without obtaining his/her consent from the petitioner even though he/she did not obtain his/her consent, by opening the SK Telecom cell phone in the name of the petitioner.

A. On December 2, 2014, in the above C, without the consent of the petitioner, one copy of the application for membership of the Malibama in the customer name column in the name of the petitioner, such as stating D', 'F in the date of birth', 'F in the contact column', G in the contact column, '89,800 in the delivery price column', '82,000 in the public disclosure subsidy column', 'a copy of the application for membership of the Malibama' without the consent of the petitioner;

B. A copy of the "application for subscription to LG U" was forged without the petitioner's consent, stating "D", "I" in the name of the subscriber, "I" in the resident registration number column, "Dong Dongdu H" in the address column, "National in the bank name column, "J" in the account number column, and "789,800 in the delivery price column" in one copy of the "application for subscription to LGU" without the petitioner's consent.

2. The Defendant:

A. The above 1-A

As described in paragraph (1), the applicant for the lelebane membership in the false name of the petitioner shall use the K mobile phone opening agency for the staff of the KT's mobile phone opening agency to open the e-phone 6 connected to the e-phone;

B. The above 2-B

As stated in paragraph (1), the application for forged LGU opened only to the staff of the mobile phone opening agency of the LGU, and opened the L phone number connected to the AGU 6.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to mobile phone subscription applications;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;