1. The Plaintiff:

A. As regards the Defendant Shee Construction Co., Ltd, the amount of KRW 382,401,192 and KRW 300,000,000 among them:

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is the party. 1) The plaintiff is the Btel with 630 households, Dong, 630, located in five parcels, Busan, Suwon-gu, Busan, and five parcels (hereinafter "the officetel of this case").

(2) The Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s Intervenor newly constructed and sold the instant officetel, and the Plaintiff’s Intervenor’s assistant construction (hereinafter “Defendant’s assistant construction”) is the contractor that performed the instant officetel construction (hereinafter “instant new construction”) by being awarded a contract from the Plaintiff for the instant officetel construction (hereinafter “instant construction”) and the Defendant’s construction mutual aid association (hereinafter “Defendant’s association”) guarantees the Defendant’s assistant construction’s duty to repair defects in the instant officetel.

B. Around October 201, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works in this case with Defendant Seohee Construction, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works with the fifth to fourth underground floors of the construction site size, the contract amount of KRW 40,57,000,000, and the thirty months from the date of reporting the commencement of the construction period. On March 16, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction works with Defendant Seohee Construction with the five to twenty underground floors of the construction site size, the total floor size of the construction site, the contract amount of KRW 38,998, the contract amount of KRW 42,911,70,00, and the contract for construction works modification for thirty months from the date of reporting the commencement of the construction period.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant contract” in combination with the said contract for construction works and the contract for change thereof.

On November 7, 2014, the Defendant Union and the instant officetel entered into a contract for the repair of defects (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant contract for the repair of defects”) with respect to the obligation to repair defects of the instant officetels after completion of the instant new construction project and undergoing the inspection for the use of the instant officetels, and issued a warranty bond for defects to the Plaintiff.

The amount of security deposit for the contract name guarantee period shall be set as follows: 407, 398, 871 of October 31, 2014 from October 31, 2014 to October 30, 2015;