logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.08.23 2015가합41995
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) paid KRW 15,626,940 to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its amount from April 26, 2014 to August 23, 2017.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff's medical treatment and treatment 1) The plaintiff's industrial accident that fell at the construction site of the defendant hospital (hereinafter referred to as "emergency accident").

(C) while proceeding in relation to the case, the C University Medical Center (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant designated as the physical examination institution.

A) A physical examination was conducted on April 19, 2013. As a result of the said physical examination, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having been diagnosed by the escape symptoms between the 5-6 following the climatic typology and the 6-7 malpology from the Defendant Hospital and the assistant professor D, etc. (2) Accordingly, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, from May 14:10 to 19:15, and was hospitalized in the process of the climatic typology and the climatic typology (hereinafter “instant operation”). The Plaintiff was hospitalized in the Defendant Hospital, and was hospitalized in the climatic typology and the climatic typology to remove the sclimatic typology.

3. After the instant surgery, the medical personnel at the Defendant hospital showed symptoms that do not have a power to the right side of the Plaintiff, and conducted the MaRI test against the Plaintiff on May 30, 2013, but did not have any specific opinion. However, even though the Plaintiff removed the Maurology on May 31, 2013, the Plaintiff did not have a parturology, and even if the maurology was removed, the Plaintiff continued to have a parturology and the maurology symptoms of the maurology and urology on June 1, 2013.

Accordingly, around June 1, 2013, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital had taken measures to add the amount of brain trees to the Plaintiff at around 22:30 on June 1, 2013.

B. On June 4, 2013, the Plaintiff’s current state was diagnosed as pets due to incomplete aquatic damage in the rehabilitation department of the Defendant hospital, and was diagnosed as pets due to incomplete aquatic damage, from that time, one-half rehabilitation treatment was provided from that time. However, inasmuch as it is impossible to walk independently due to the weakening, sense of sense, degradation, occupation, etc. of the site at present, it is impossible for the Plaintiff to walk independently, and its sexual function is attributable to the neutronic urology, and the ne

arrow