The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the above judgment shall be publicly notified.

1. On January 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months at the Jeju District Court for perjury and on October 31, 2014, the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 31, 2014.

On July 2, 2012, the Defendant assumed office as a joint representative director of E (State) holding 100% of this equity interest, and F entered into a contract to transfer E (State) holding 100% of said equity interest to G around December 15, 2010, but only the place of business is transferred to G and is under dispute with G as a result of the discharge of the balance.

On July 2, 2012, the Defendant issued a promissory note in the name of E (State) in order to secure the credit to E (State) in dispute to F (State), after being newly appointed as a common representative director by F on July 2, 2012, the Defendant issued a promissory note in the name of E (State) and proposed to be notarized, and the consent F issued a promissory note by delivering the corporate seal impression and a certificate of personal seal impression of the common representative director I (state registration as of February 8, 2010) in the E (State) office located in Seoul H (State).

1. Around July 2, 2012, the Defendant forged securities: (a) stated “D” in the recipient column “D (State”; (b) the amount column; (c) the issue date column; and (d) “E (State representative director I” in the issuer’s name column; and (c) affixed the seal impression of the E (State) corporation prepared following the I’s name.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with F, forged a promissory note in the name of E (State) representative director, which is a securities, for the purpose of exercising the rights.

2. On July 16, 2012, the Defendant issued a false promissory note as if a notary public in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government issued the said forged promissory note in order to obtain a notarial deed from a legal entity “K” to an attorney who is aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with F, exercised a forged promissory note.

3. The Defendant forged a private document as above at the same time and place as the foregoing two paragraphs.