Defendant

A Imprisonment of 1 year and fine of 10,000,000 won, Defendant B's imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant C and D shall be punished by imprisonment of 4 months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 24, 2012, 2012, the Seoul Southern District Office of Education and the construction cost of KRW 44010,000 (the first: KRW 160,000,000; KRW 240,000; KRW 2010,000) are called the “instant construction” (hereinafter the “instant construction”). The said first construction is called the “the first construction”; the said second construction is called the “the instant second construction”; and the said second construction” concluded the instant construction contract from the 27th of the same month to the completion of the construction work on August 22, 2013.

Defendant

A as a director of L, a corporation was in charge of supervising the instant secondary construction from February 2013 to August 2013, 2013, and Defendant B was an employee of L, who was a field agent of the said construction. Defendant C and D were in charge of the instant secondary construction from June 2013 to September 2013.

1. Defendant A and B’s co-principaled Defendant B received Defendant A’s request during the process of the instant secondary construction from the J Middle School located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and from April 29, 2013 to the same year.

5.6 April 29, 200 during the period until 27.

4. 30.

5.1.1.

5.8.

5.9.

5. Between 27.2, the instant secondary construction workers N,O, and P had Defendant A’s personal house electrical construction in Q of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

After that, around July 26, 2013, Defendant B examined the false statement of labor cost prepared as if the above N et al. worked at the above construction site for the six-day period, and filed a claim for labor cost for the above N et al. by submitting it to the Seoul Southern District Office of Education with the consent of Defendant A who is a supervisor.

In full view of R’s investigative agencies and the statements in this Court, a person who prepares a statement of labor cost is recognized as being N, not Defendant B, and thus, recognized as above.

However, the above N et al. merely carried out the electrical construction of Defendant A's house during the above period and did not carry out the work at the construction site.

In this respect.