1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is exempt from the entry of “stock company” in the name of the Company C (hereinafter “stock company”) that is a manufacturer of sculptures (not holding a construction license).

) The actual operator is the defendant at the beginning of the year 2012, the defendant is the defendant at the jurisdiction of Gangwon-do (hereinafter referred to as "D").

(2) After examining the above plan, the Defendant decided to implement the above project on May 2012, and on July 2012, 2012, determined I as the commencement work of the instant primary construction project by making a bid for the selection of the construction works of HH class G construction works (the main type “the instant primary construction works”; hereinafter referred to as “the instant primary construction works”) among the instant construction works, with the knowledge that there was a plan to create sculptures in Japan, through E and F, who is a public official of the Defendant Economic Tourism and Tourism, and E and F, who is a public official of the Defendant.

around October 2012, I subcontracted the installation work of sculptures among the instant primary works to J, which is a specialized construction business license holder, and the subcontracted work by J was all performed by C.

3) On or around April 2013, when the first construction of the instant case was in progress, the Defendant: (a) the construction of the G incidental facilities in the K-Japan G from the construction proposed by the Plaintiff; (b) the construction of the main sculpture “the delivery, stage, water supply unit”; and (c) the instant second construction.”

A) Around May 2013, L was determined as the commencement of the instant secondary construction project by deciding on the implementation of the relevant construction project. L was subcontracted to M, which is a specialized construction business license holder, among the instant secondary construction works, and M was subcontracted to M. The subcontracted construction project. 4) The Defendant determined the implementation of the Nil Daily G Scenic Creation Project (the “major sculpture”; hereinafter “the instant third construction project”) among the construction projects proposed by the Plaintiff around July 2013, when the Plaintiff was underway, around July 2013, when the first and second construction works were in progress. Around August 2013, 2013, L was awarded a bid for the selection of the relevant construction project, and M was subcontracted to M. on March 3.