A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2016, the defrauded: (a) on August 18, 2016, the Defendant called the Defendant’s residence located in Seocheon-si C and 113 Dong 1501, on the part of the Defendant, to put up a letter stating that the victim D would have an excessive teacher for his/her children on the Internet website; (b) he/she graduated from the Seoul Science High School; (c) graduated from the Seoul Science High School; and (d) experienced much experience in the other country; (c) so, the Defendant may be 1.40,000 won per month if he/she would be over-paid and paid in a lump sum for four months and other expenses.

A false statement was made.

However, the defendant did not graduate from the Seoul Science High School, and there was no fact that he graduated from the course of study at the Central University, and there was no extra experience, so there was no intention or ability for the victim to go beyond the school.

The Defendant received a remittance of KRW 1.4 million from the damaged party on August 21, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On September 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around September 3, 2016, on September 3, 2016, 2016, on the Defendant’s residence, the victim E puts his/her writing to seek an extra-school teacher on the Internet website; (b) pretended and contacted that he/she was his/her parent; (c) had the inter-school students, who graduated from the Seoul Science and Technology High School and graduated from the Central University; and (d) told the victim to contact with his/her students, the Defendant would have called that he/she would have contacted him/her; (d) could have exceeded three months; and (e) would have paid KRW 1.5 million in lump sum.

However, the Defendant did not graduate from the Seoul Science High School and did not have any intention or ability to give excessive attention to the victims because there was no fact that the Defendant graduated from the Central University.

The Defendant received from the injured party the remittance of KRW 1.5 million around September 4, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement to E.