A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 18, 2015, the Defendant demanded the victim E to change the meat rice, rice rice, etc. purchased from the injured party before the demand from the injured party E in the D commercial building located in Seopopo City, Seopopo City on November 16:50, 2015, but it is refused, and there is no transition ( approximately 20cm in total length and approximately 10cm in blade length) which is a dangerous object in the usatian ( approximately 20cm in total).

In addition, the victim threatened the victim with several times on the side side of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Relevant Article 284 of the Criminal Act, Articles 283 (1) and 283 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, the sentencing guidelines set forth in the sentencing guidelines are as follows: The following circumstances are considered: (a) recognizing the facts of the crime; (b) there is no record of being punished for the same crime or of being sentenced to a fine heavier than the fine; (c) there is no record of being sentenced to a punishment heavier than the fine; and (d) there is no unfavorable circumstance that the injured person does not want to be punished against the accused by mutual agreement with the injured party: The nature of the crime is not good in light of the number of crimes: The defendant's age, sex, environment, health conditions, etc.