logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2014.11.28 2013고정247
업무방해
Text

Defendant

A A A A with a fine of KRW 2 million, Defendant B with a fine of KRW 1 million, Defendant C with a fine of KRW 2 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants andO made a meeting of "P" to obtain additional indirect compensation from the Victim's Gyeongbuk Development Corporation on the ground that there is a lack of compensation for land to people who reside in the site of the Gyeongbuk-do Incheon Metropolitan City, AnO formed a group of "P" in order to obtain additional indirect compensation from the Victim's Gyeongbuk Development Corporation, such as the chairperson, the secretary general, and the director general of the external cooperation division, and Defendant C shared residents living in the above new city area to interfere with construction works of new city by gathering residents living in the above new city area and preventing the driving of construction machinery at the site of the new city development project or avoiding disturbance.

O, Defendant A, Defendant C, Defendant J, Defendant B, Defendant I, and Defendant G meta with the construction site of Gyeong-dong-si, 09:30 on May 18, 2012, at the construction site of Gyeong-do, Gyeong-do, 1210 located in the Doyang-ri Doyang-ri, Chungcheongnam-do, and the construction site of Gyeong-do, Gyeong-do, which was undergoing excavation works between the two parties, so that the victim’s work may be interrupted, and the victim’s work may be interrupted.

In addition, from around that time to November 15:00 to around that time, the Defendants suspended or delayed the victim’s new city construction work on a total of 30 occasions by either avoiding disturbance or occupying offices without permission by means of either avoiding disturbance at the construction site of the new city of the Gancheon-gun, Ycheon-gun, Ancheon-gun, as described in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the Defendants independently or in collusion interfered with the victim's work by force.

2. Defendant B, at around 13:00 on September 28, 2012, entered the victim Gyeongbuk-do 11120 on the same ground as the preceding paragraph, entering into the victim Gyeongbuk-do Doyang-do 1120 on the part of the Do office, which was installed at the same place, into a red fluorial fluor, on the guidance signboard for the construction of new city, which was located in the victim Do office located therein, thereby impairing the utility of the above guidance signboard equivalent to KRW 600,000 at the market price.

arrow