logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2017.07.13 2016가합12244
해고무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Grounds for recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply);

2) Each entry, witness B’s testimony, witness C’s partial testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

A. The defendant is a local government-invested entity that belongs to educational affairs, and the plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the principal of the D Middle School under the defendant's command from May 1, 1998 to the principal of the D Middle School under the defendant's command (hereinafter referred to as "non-party school"), and has been working as the supervisor of the field of the

B. On June 23, 2016, Nonparty 2 suffered an injury that requires six weeks’ medical treatment to the gallebr F while Nonparty 2 had a horse dispute with the same camping House F on the same day.

on June 24, 2016, F’s father G had verbal abuse and caused physical fightings while discussing the problem with the Plaintiff at the supervision room of Nonparty 2’s school.

C. On July 1, 2016, Nonparty 1 opened a meeting to determine to issue a warning to the Plaintiff on the ground of injury to dignity, and issued a warning.

G filed a civil petition of “I” on the national newspaper of H Hamcheon Office of Education, and J Seoul Central Library published the article of “K” as well as the article of “M” on its own website.

G alleged that “the Plaintiff visited the school several times thereafter, left the workplace from time to time, and received money and valuables as guidance expenses from the parents.” On July 13, 2016, the G requested the non-party school to disclose the information on “the details of the revenue and expenditure of after-school schools at night”.

E. On July 12, 2016, Non-Party B, the principal of Non-Party B, who opened several meetings, discussed issues such as leaving the Plaintiff’s workplace, receiving guidance fees, etc., and recommended the Plaintiff to resign by talking about the possibility of criminal punishment on July 13, 2016.

F. On July 13, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted a resignation letter to a non-party school, and the said resignation letter was accepted on July 2016.

arrow