logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2018.07.24 2018고정74
풍속영업의규제에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person who conducts public morals business and persons engaged in public morals business shall engage in acts, such as arranging sexual traffic, at a customs place of business.

The Defendant is a person engaged in a custom business that manages “Curel”, a lodging establishment located in Gu and America, from February 2017.

1. On February 23, 2017, the Defendant provided, around February 23, 2017, the key to the above apartment room to E, who works for “D” on the first floor below the above apartment building, and provided, in advance, a man whose name and name are unknown, with a place where sexual traffic is to be engaged in within the “Cel” guest room.

2. On March 27, 2017, the Defendant provided the key to the above telecom to the above telecom “Curel” in advance, and the said F and G provided the place where the said telecom would engage in sexual traffic within the “Curcom” guest room.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police in H and E;

1. Each police statement made to F and I;

1. Seizure records;

1. Investigation report (Attachment to photographs of a camera recorded on a smartphone owned by the victim), investigation report (Attachment to photographs of the victim's sex purchase remaining pictures, etc.), investigation report (Attachment to photographs of the suspect's sexual traffic delivery of the price for sexual traffic);

1. The written vindication (the defendant and his defense counsel do not correspond to "professors" under Article 3 of the Customs Business Regulation Act, and the defendant did not know that the above telecom is used as a place of sexual traffic, and therefore the defendant did not have any intention to commit the crime of this case.

Article 3 of the Regulation of Customs Business Act shall not engage in any of the following acts at a place where public morals business is conducted:

Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act provides that "the employees prescribed by Presidential Decree" shall be defined as "the business operator shall act on behalf of the business operator or on behalf of the business operator regardless of the name in the section other than each subparagraph of Article 3, Article 6 (1) and Article 9 (1) of the same Act.

arrow