logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2016.10.28 2013가합1726
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 44,113,458; KRW 1,500,00 for Plaintiff B; and KRW 750,000 for Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The party-related Plaintiff A is a patient hospitalized in the Macheon National University Hospital of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by the Defendant with brain color, and Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s wife, Plaintiff C, D, E, and F. The Plaintiff’s children.

(hereinafter referred to as “Ssaturine Plaintiffs” if they are referred to the rest of the Plaintiffs other than Plaintiff A.

Plaintiff

A's brain flasing treatment (1) around 18:40 on September 6, 2012, Plaintiff A showed and used the symptoms of the mathy of the left upper part of the A, and was transferred to Defendant Hospital around 20:01 on the 119 first-lane.

At the time, the plaintiff A was well aware of the state of consciousness, but there was a left disorder and the left-hand horseis.

The physician G of the Emergency Medical Center is a measure to evaluate the level of Plaintiff A’s GCS Glasgow Glacale disability (GCS), which is a combination response (Eye oping, one point to four points), language reaction (Verbal repon), physical reaction (Verbal respon), one point to five points), and 1 point to six points. The score is higher, and the neological state is good and low (3 points), and the neological state is positive (15 points, severe mixed status), and 5 points for language response, and 6 points for physical response, and the marrobre diagnosis was diagnosed with each other.

② Around 20:06, as a result of brain-related shooting against Plaintiff A, there was a trace of brain fluencing on the left-hand side of the past, and the opinion on brain fluencing was not observed. At around 20:11, around 20:1, there was a observation of a high-level brain fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flus

Plaintiff

Blood collection for A was conducted at around 20:04, and blood examination results were reported from around 20:26 to around 20:50. Of which, the part activation of APT was determined as a result of determining whether blood response was normally performed, liquid medication.

arrow