Plaintiff 1 and nine others (Attorney Park Young-young et al., Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

Republic of Korea (Government Law Firm Corporation, Attorneys Seo-jin et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant)

April 30, 2015

Suwon District Court Decision 2013Gahap26107 Decided May 29, 2014

1. The plaintiffs' appeal against the defendant and the incidental appeal against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be borne by each person;

1. Purport of claim

The defendant pays to the plaintiff 1, 3, 6, and 9 30 million won, 7,500,000 won, 7,000,000 won to the plaintiff 4, and 7,000,000 won to the plaintiff 5,000, 10,000 won to the plaintiff 8, and 10,50,000 won to the plaintiff 8, and 9,00,000,000 won to the plaintiff 10, from November 1, 2010 to the delivery date of the application for amendment of the purport of this case, 5% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment, and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of complete payment.

2. Purport of appeal

Each part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiffs falling under the order to pay below shall be revoked. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs 1, 3, 6, and 9 27,00,000 won, each of 6,000,000 won to the plaintiffs 2, and 6,50,000 won to the plaintiffs 4, 6,000 won, 5,000,000 won to the plaintiffs 5, and 7, and 9,500,000 won to the plaintiffs 8, and 8,000,000 won to the plaintiffs 10, and 5% per annum from November 1, 2010 to the date of the judgment of the appellate court, and 20% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

3. Purport of incidental appeal;

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked, and all plaintiffs' claims corresponding to the revoked part shall be dismissed.

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) evidence submitted in addition to the trial court, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiffs’ assertion, and the statement of the first instance court’s decision is the same with the rejection of the statement of evidence Nos. 79 through 82, which is insufficient to recognize the plaintiffs’ assertion; and (b) thus, (c)

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, all appeals by the plaintiffs against the defendant and incidental appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed as it is without merit.

Judges Han-young (Presiding Judge)