logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.07 2017고단6990
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months and by a fine of five million won, by imprisonment for six months and by a fine of five million won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] Defendant A was sentenced to the suspended sentence of two years and a fine of five million won in August of 2014 by the Incheon District Court on September 19, 2014 due to a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic (such as arranging sexual traffic).

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendants B’ joint crime is the owner of a sexual traffic business with the trade name “F”, and Defendant A is an employee who manages the said business in the daytime.

From April 7, 2017 to April 19, 2017, Defendants conspired to install five marina rooms, etc. in the above-mentioned business premises located on the first floor of the building located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, and employed female employees H and I of sexual traffic, and instruct male buyers who found in the above business establishments with the price for sexual traffic at KRW 60,00 to the marina room by receiving KRW 60,00 to KRW 120,00 from the sexual buyers, and let them do similar sexual intercourse by allowing them to enter the sexual organ of a sexual purchaser and to conduct sexual intercourse in a manner that makes it possible for them to take the sexual organ of a sexual purchaser or to see it by hand.

2. Defendant A is a business owner who was transferred the business of sexual traffic establishments with the trade name “F” from the above B around April 20, 2017.

At around 15:00 on April 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) directed 60,000 won from a male sex purchaser on his/her name in a smuggling; and (b) ordered I to engage in a similar sexual intercourse by allowing I to enter the said sex purchaser’s sexual organ as soon as possible or to see it by hand; and (c) from April 20, 2017 to April 24, 2017, the Defendant employed H and I to arrange sexual intercourse by the same method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of statutes on business registration certificates;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of Sexual Traffic for the relevant criminal facts, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act.

arrow