logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014.11.20 2014나2001834
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant Yangju-si shall be revoked, and the plaintiff who falls under the above revoked part shall be the defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Before the occurrence of the accident, the Plaintiff is a person who has been engaged in a business, such as wholesale, etc. of paintings in the name of “C” at a place of business located in both weeks.

(2) In the previous Plaintiff’s place of business, the two lines of the two lines of the road to connect “Yong-si, Yong-si, Yong-si, Yong-si,” were passed, but Defendant Gyeonggi-do decided to expand the said road around 1999, and started construction work to expand and pack the said road to the fourth line of the road on November 13, 200, subject to a public announcement on modification of the road zone, and completed the State-funded 56 (hereinafter “instant road”).

(3) Since around 1998, the defendant Yangju-si installed a "type pipeline" which connects the plaintiff's place of business to the new stream through the plaintiff's place of business (hereinafter "the road of this case"), and the above pipelines passed across the road of this case. However, prior to the construction of the road of this case, the road of this case was installed with a volume of 1.1m price per square meter per square meter per square meter for the purpose of discharging rainwater or natural oil flowing out from the field below the road of this case. At the time of the occurrence of the flood flood disaster around 1997, the defendant Gyeonggi-do, upon considering the civil petition, etc. that the above me was installed with the above me, at the time of the construction of the road of this case and the construction of the road of this case was removed and connected to the above me with the above me, the construction of the road of this case was implemented as a substitute facility of 2.5m x 2.0m square meters (hereinafter "the construction of the facility of this case").

(4) The Defendant Gyeonggi-do completed the construction without collecting existing optical cable lines, etc., which had been used during the construction of the instant facilities (i.e., the so-called “so-called “so-called,” which was set up between the floor and the ceiling of the facilities, by setting up the strings between the floor and the ceiling of the facilities.

arrow