logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.05.22 2019고단1131
공문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

A copy of a seized smartphone (No. 1) shall be confiscated from the accused.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant assumes false information with public prosecutors, investigators, employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., and commits the crime of fraud, etc. in collusion with the names and poor victims of the telephone financial fraud group, through which money is stolen by an unspecified number of people, the Defendant is an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, who commits the crime of fraud, etc., and the Defendant is a so-called receipt and delivery of money from the victims to persons with poor names.

1. On October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) conspired with his name in collusion, and on October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (b) instructed the public prosecutor and investigator in charge of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office and the Financial Services Commission to track the financial account in accordance with the major measures and cooperation documents related to the bank account tracking; (c) the Financial Services Commission led the public prosecutor and investigator in charge of the Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office and the relevant Seoul Central Public Prosecutor’s Office to track the bank account. The Financial Services Commission led you to trace the bank account and illegal funds through the bank tracking; (d) the process of settlement and the return of the National Treasury in accordance with Article 27(3) of the Financial Services Commission Act when verifying illegal accounts and illegal funds after tracking the account; and (d) the Chairman of the Financial Services Commission may prove transparency of the account via tracking the account and then printed out the file in the name of the Chairperson using his/her name near the Seoul Frank, and then printed out 10 copies of the electronic document in his/her name.

2. On October 19, 2018, the Defendant of the forged official document uttering against B, in collusion with the person who was not the party in whose name the statement was made, only B, who was waiting for withdrawal of cash by deceiving the person who was not the party in whose name the person was the person in whose name the person was the person in whose name the person was the person in whose name the person was the person in whose name the person was the person in whose name was the person in whose name was the person in whose name the statement was made, shall complete one copy

arrow