logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.10.25 2019고합227
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복상해등)등
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a maximum term of two years and a short term of one year and six months.

Seized evidence No. 6 (Gallonian No. 8 (IMF. 1.0)

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A In misrepresenting to the public prosecutor, investigator, employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, etc., a person who introduced the name and unfortunateed person of the telephone financial fraud group (so-called scaming fraud group) to friendly B to take the responsibility for the collection of the fraud crime by deceiving a large number of unspecified persons, and the defendant B is an employee of the Financial Services Commission in collusion with the name and unfortunateed person of the Boscing fraud group to commit the crime such as fraud, and a person who proposes to take the responsibility for receiving the money from the victim.

1. The Defendants, in collusion with the members of the telephone financial fraud group (one name Bophishing fraud group) to obtain money, but the names infinite shall induce the victim to withdraw cash by making a false statement to the Financial Services Commission, such as “the name of the party in question has been used for the crime of the party in question so that he/she may withdraw money from the bank because he/she has been used for the crime of the party in question.” Defendant B assumes the responsibility of the Financial Supervisory Service or the Financial Services Commission to act as a one-person who assumes the person who assumes the position of staff of the Financial Supervisory Service or the Financial Services Commission and receives cash that has been withdrawn from the victim. Upon the receipt of money from the victim, the Defendants conspired to divide the money by not delivering it to the above members of the party in question but

On February 2019, the Defendants of forgery of the official document with the Financial Services Commission, in collusion with the names in order to exercise their authority, directed the public prosecutor in charge of the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office and the investigator in charge of the Financial Services Commission in accordance with the major measures and cooperation documents related to tracking of the financial account, the Financial Services Commission, without authority, to track the financial account.

The Financial Services Commission shall conduct an account tracking through the account tracking for your finance, and the Financial Services Commission shall conduct an account tracking for its illegal funds, and Article 27 (3) of the Financial Services Commission Act when checking illegal accounts and illegal funds after the account tracking.

arrow