logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.02.13 2014가단32622
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 18,200,00 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from September 19, 2014 to February 13, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A. Around 2012, the Plaintiff requested a licensed real estate agent D who operates the “C Licensed Real Estate Agent Office” located in Daegu-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul to intermediate commercial building purchase.

B. On November 2012, D and its brokerage assistant E (D’s ASEAN) heard a story that “the commercial buildings located in the coaches located in the Daegu-gu G District-based commercial district-centered G District-based commercial district (hereinafter “GGG-gu”) have been sold by a licensed real estate agent office located in the Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.”

C. D and E considered that the commercial building from which the sale was known as usual, as above, was No. 101 of H No. 1 on the registry of the commercial building located in Daegu Dong-gu H (U.S.) Daegu-dong-gu H, Daegu-gu, and directly displayed the Plaintiff as the commercial building located in H, and directly displayed the above H's commercial building (U.S.).

However, it seems that the tenant operated the beauty room at the time of No. 108 of the first floor No. 108 of the Daegu East-gu 108, instead of H(unuse room) commercial buildings actually gathered from H.

had been the case

(hereinafter referred to as 108) D.

D and E did not confirm the accurate location of 108 commercial buildings from each object and explained to the effect that they are 108 commercial buildings from each object to the Plaintiff. As a result, the Plaintiff thought that 108 commercial buildings are directly the commercial buildings from each other. On November 9, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract with the owner JJ of 108 commercial buildings and 108 commercial buildings, and completed the registration of ownership transfer as to 10 million commercial buildings from the purchase price of KRW 338 million on the date of the contract, the remainder is paid on November 19, 2012, and the registration of ownership transfer as to 108 commercial buildings is completed.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant sales contract”). E.

After completing the registration of transfer of ownership with respect to 108 commercial buildings, the Plaintiff became aware that 108 commercial buildings were not originally intended to purchase (hereinafter referred to as “market price No. 101”).

F. At the time of the instant sales contract, the market price of 101 commercial buildings is the market price.

arrow