logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.10.11 2017고단1730
업무방해등
Text

A fine of three million won shall be imposed on a defendant.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 5, 2017, at around 23:30 on July 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was a victim C (n, 52 years old); (b) was a victim C (n, 52 years old); and (c) was a victim who wishes to change the drinking value; (d) “at any time, he/she has drinking alcohol;

In addition, the victim's business was obstructed by force by refusing to withdraw from the above singing room, and by obstructing the victim's business by force. The victim's business was 15 minutes of the disturbance, such as putting the victim's bath while taking the victim's bath. The police officer, upon receiving the report, took the victim's bath, 10 minutes of the disturbance and 10 minutes of the disturbance.

2. In around 23:45 on July 5, 2017, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly 10 minutes of the victim’s crypology, including “the victim’s cryptyp, the same bitch f,” among the victims of the instant cryption, on the ground that: (a) the victim’s crypology, who was dispatched to the site upon receipt of a 112 report on the fact that the Defendant avoided the disturbance without paying the said alcohol value; and (b) the victim’s crypology, who was called “the victim’s cryption,” who was the owner of the said cryption, was the victim of the said crypology.

3. On July 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender for the same crime as paragraphs 1 and 2 of the same paragraph on July 6, 2017; and (b) boarded the patrol vehicle on board the Busan Police Station E zone; (b) disembarked from the patrol vehicle; and (c) was off from the patrol vehicle; and (d) was off from the patrol vehicle of the Busan Police Station E zone belonging to the Busan Police Station E zone; and (c) “I wish to do so from

“In doing so, he assaulted the F’s face to take the F’s face by drinking, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reported accidents and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the arrest of flagrant offenders and movement to districts);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (in the case of insult) and Article 136 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts.

arrow