logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고단2223
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 7, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for 8 months at the Gwangju District Court for fraud, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 15, 2015.

1. AG, AH, AI, and AJ (223 order group 2017) Defendant calls to a victim AG (35 years old) who is operating a AK entertainment master in Gangwon-gu, Gangwon-gu, Seoul, and 303 around October 13, 2016 at his/her own residence, and calls to a victim AG (35 years old) who is operating a AK entertainment master in Gangwon-do, and “this is now in Jeju-do, and one million won is sent at expenses.

“A false statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, the defendant was residing in Gwangju, not Jeju-do, and was trying to use the money from the injured party for the cost of living, and did not have the intent or ability to work at the victim's entertainment center.

In addition, from around that time to December 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received KRW 1 million from the victim to the corporate bank account (AF) account under the name of the Defendant; and (c) received total sum of KRW 4 million from the victim AG, AH, AI, and AJ from the victim to the victim’s total sum of KRW 4080,000,000 from the victim’s list of crimes.

2. The Defendant, on April 3, 2017, on the Internet around 09:17, on the part of the victim AL, advertised that the Defendant is seeking female employees at the former Jinan-gun AM shop located in the North Jinan-gun, and contact the victim AL operating the said main shop with the victim AL who was operating the said main shop, and the cost listed in the Jeju-do is required, and one million won is required to be borne by the said female employees.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to work as an employee.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he acquired 1 million won from the victim to the corporate bank account (AF) in the name of the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. AG, .

arrow