Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is the legal marital relationship between the Defendant and the victim B (the age of 57, the female), and the written indictment for the C Apartment D around May 24, 2019, which is written in E around May 24, 2019. However, according to the Defendant’s statement and records, it is obvious that the written indictment is a clerical error in subparagraph d.
During a dispute over an insurance issue, during the process of preventing the victim from departing from his/her job, he/she was a vision and committed three times the victim's head in drinking.
2. Determination
(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;
(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act.
C. The victim's non-application for punishment was submitted to the purport that the defendant does not want to be punished after the prosecution of this case.
(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;