A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 24, 2017, at around 17:30 on February 24, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with the victim C, operated by Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, by taking advantage of the gaps in surveillance over the victim; (b) KRW 3,500 of the market price owned by the victim; or (c) KRW 1,00,000 of the market price owned by the victim.

2. On February 23, 2017, at around 18:30 on February 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft with a 16,000 dub wave equivalent to the market price owned by the victim, by taking advantage of the gap in the victim’s surveillance neglected; (b) around 000 management of the victim E located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

3. At around 17:30 on February 19, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with a 16,000 head strike equivalent to the market price owned by the victim by taking advantage of the gaps where the surveillance of the victim E was neglected; (b) around 17:30 on February 19, 2017.

4. On February 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 000 convenience stores for the operation of the Victim G in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F on February 10, 2017; (b) 2 sugars equivalent to KRW 7,000 in the market price owned by the victim using a gap in the victim’s surveillance negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of E and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photograph damaged objects and CCTV-cape;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence is that the criminal defendant committed the crime in this case, even though he/she had the record of two times a fine as a result of larceny or suspension of indictment, and that the act of theft committed several times, is disadvantageous.

However, the fact that the defendant repents the defendant's wrong, the fact that the theft amount is minor is considered as favorable circumstances, and other factors of sentencing such as the age, sex, environment, etc. of the defendant were determined as ordered.